According to the Guide, the CUP method, as a rule, includes the following stages:
1. Analysis of material terms that affect a loan’s pricing
2. Analysis of the borrower’s credit rating in order to assess the creditor’s risk when it provides financing (taking into account the influence of group membership on the borrower’s credit rating)
3. Search for potentially comparable transactions concluded between unrelated parties with credit ratings comparable to the borrower’s and on similar terms
4. Comparability adjustments (if needed) and calculation of an arm’s-length interest rates range
The Guide’s approach to analyzing intragroup loans fully complies with the approach to analyzing intragroup financing transactions stipulated in the OECD Guidelines.
A borrower’s creditworthiness is one of the main factors that independent creditors take into account when they assess the terms of a financing transaction.
The Guide notes that a credit rating may be determined both for assessing the overall creditworthiness of an MNE group (or the group’s parent entity) as well as for a specific issue of debt. When both ratings are available, the credit rating of a financial instrument may be more appropriate to be used in a benchmarking study than the issuer’s (borrower’s) credit rating.
In addition, the Guide comments on the differences in the methodologies applied for assessing credit ratings determined with publicly available tools and by independent rating agencies. They note that public tools normally use limited quantitative data in assessing a credit rating, whereas independent rating agencies carry out a detailed quantitative analysis of historic and forecast data as well as a qualitative analysis.
The Guide also notes that group membership may influence the credit rating of a related borrower and its ability to raise financing.
The Guide pays special attention to the search for comparable transactions between unrelated parties. The following have been designated as comparability criteria impacting loan interest rates that must be taken into account:
Unlike the recommendations published by the OECD, the Guide does not describe the principles to be followed for the correct determination of the terms of financial transactions. In particular, the Guide does not review the procedure for recognizing intragroup financing as a loan in substance[2] (to assess the probability that a loan will be reclassified as an equity contribution), nor does it comment on the identification of commercial and financial conditions[3] or the economically significant characteristics of financial transactions.[4]
In addition, the Guide, unlike the OECD Guidelines, includes a detailed example of a comparability adjustment of the tenors of potentially comparable transactions to make them consistent with the tenor of an analyzed transaction.
How can BaOne help?
The BaOne team stands ready to provide support with the following issues related to intragroup financial transactions and transactions of financial institutions in the UAE:
[1] Law “On Corporate Tax and Profits Tax” (2022) and Resolution No. 97 “Requirement to Compile TP Documentation” (2023).
[2] Clauses 10.4-10.13 of the OECD Guidelines.
[3] Clauses 10.14-10.20 of the OECD Guidelines.
[4] Clauses 10.21-10.38 of the OECD Guidelines.